Friday, January 20, 2012

Some thoughts on last night's television

Lots of excitement on TV last night: Leonard and Penny might be getting back together, a great series of completely-immature-yet-still-hilarious double entendres from Sheldon, and a funny gag involving a life-size cardboard cutout of Zachary Quinto.

Oh, what's that? You came to Sunshine State Sarah for something other than a recap of Big Bang Theory's 100th episode? Heh. OK, fine. There was also some political stuff on last night too. Here's my thoughts...
  • Here's the debate video if you missed it:
  • Best moment of that 1 hour 47 minute video starts at the 4:42 mark, when military cadets from The Citadel sang our national anthem a cappella. They gave an elegant and classy performance.
  • The crowd reaction to Gingrich's answer shows how very, very sick Republican voters are of this kind of nonsense.
  • I really liked Romney's response to this too: simply and emphatically stating that the voters want to get to the real issues. Yes, please.
  • I'm also sick of how the media is in a tizzy about "how are female voters going to react to this??!" Well, I'm a female, Southern, Presbyterian, social conservative Republican voter and it's just not on the top of my list of most important issues in this race.
  • Memo to the pundits who are puzzled why this scandal doesn't seem to be significantly affecting Gingrich's poll numbers: the whole dang planet knows Gingrich cheated on Mrs. Gingrich #1 with Mrs. Gingrich #2, and on #2 with #3. It's a mess, no one likes it, but it's there and his supporters have already factored it into the grading curve.
  • If you are a Christian, then you believe that forgiveness is available for all of us, regardless of the sin. Again, I am not ever going to cheer for adultery, but I find Gingrich's story of finding faith and seeking redemption sincere.
  • Kudos to Grey's Anatomy for being willing to have a character describe an abortion as "You killed our baby!" and showing the devastating aftermath of such a sad and tragic "choice." (OK, OK, I'll get back to the politics, but I just wanted to say that this Christina-Owen storyline has been heartwrenching...)
  • Romney is strongest when he is defending the free market. "This president is the biggest impediment to jobs growth in this country." He needs to talk more about the details of his work with the Olympics and Bain Capital's successes. Also, high five for bringing up Obama's rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline.
  • The anti-Bain attacks need to stop. Capitalism is a messy, chaotic, roller coaster - and that's exactly how it's supposed to be. If you want the successes - the Apple Computers and grocery store aisles with hundreds of choices for your breakfast cereal and cutting edge pharmaceutical drugs - then you also have to accept the bankruptcies and the layoffs. Trying to rein in venture capitalism would require oppressive regulation that would greatly hinder the energy and innovation of the American economy.
  • Romney gave a stumbling, awkward answer to the inevitable RomneyCare question. He. Sounded. Like. William. Shatner. Figure out how to answer this question, Governor. It's not going away.
  • Also not going away: the issue about Romney's tax returns. Yes, it's not legally required. Still, I strongly believe he should release them, as soon as possible. I do not think there's anything particularly devastating in there (we all know he's rich), but my fear is that the Democrats and certain of their allies in the media will try distort the information contained in those tax returns and make it seem like there's some sort of scandal there. Romney needs to release what are undoubtedly long and complicated returns along with a memo from his staff putting the information into context, and then be prepared to respond quickly and forcefully to any attacks. There will not be as much time to correct the record if he waits until the fall.
  • Santorum had some solid answers, and landed some punches on his opponents. His whining about Gingrich saying he and Perry should drop out of the race was annoying. Gingrich fell in the polls when he whined about Romney's ads; this is not a good tactic. Santorum needs to pick up a copy of The Art of War and try not to overreact every time an opponent engages in a little political gamesmanship.
  • Santorum's answer on the SOPA question was bad, really bad. HInt, hint, Senator, people really don't like someone saying they want to control the internet. Romney and Gingrich both had great answers on this issue.
  • Romney had the best answer to the "what would you do differently in your campaign" question, saying that he'd take the time he'd attacked his fellow Republican candidates and instead use it to attack Obama. We'll see if he sticks to that in future debates, but he is absolutely right that "any of them would be a better president than Barack Obama."
  • We had an excellent Snark Factor radio show after the debate, with special guest David Limbaugh. I'll post a link to the podcast as soon as it's up, and make sure to check out Limbaugh's latest column here.
  • After the Snark Factor, I tuned into ABC's extremely over-hyped interview with Marianne Gingrich. There really weren't any bombshells, and the whole thing made me sad. Mrs. Gingrich #2 boasted that she had information that would ruin Gingrich's presidential campaign, but all she accomplished last night was to show a national television audience that she is a profoundly unhappy woman.
  • Again, there are villagers in remote Amazonian tribes that are aware that Newt Gingrich was did some sleazy stuff. The only real "revelation" last night was Mrs. Gingrich #2's claim that he had asked her for an open marriage - a claim that both Gingrich and his daughters emphatically denied.
  • While I question ABC's judgment in airing this interview to begin with, I will give them credit for giving equal time to Gingrich's daughters, who gave a strong and moving defense of their father. They came across as much classier than their former stepmother.
  • Bottom line: Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich all had strong and weak points in last night's debate, but all three of them would be much, much better than Obama.
Further reading:


I met Kira Davis at BlogCon. She rocks. Here's her debate recap.

Another fun recap from The Other McCain.



2 comments:

  1. "The anti-Bain attacks need to stop. Capitalism is a messy, chaotic, roller coaster - and that's exactly how it's supposed to be. If you want the successes - the Apple Computers and grocery store aisles with hundreds of choices for your breakfast cereal and cutting edge pharmaceutical drugs - then you also have to accept the bankruptcies and the layoffs. Trying to rein in venture capitalism would require oppressive regulation that would greatly hinder the energy and innovation of the American economy."

    That's a great point, and spot-on, but not the question at issue. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Respectfully, Jimmie, it kind of is the point. No one is arguing that what Bain did was illegal.

    Instead, the argument is basically that it wasn't "nice." Or that it was "unfair." The problem is that the way you prevent it is to put government restrictions on who companies can layoff and when, how companies can borrow money, how people can invest in companies, how parties can contract with each other, etc.

    Preventing the cases where a Bain-managed company didn't do well would stand a big chance of destroying the opportunity for the cases where their companies DID do well.

    If you remove the risk, you also lose the reward. Just ask any kid bored by the new, "safe" playgrounds installed all over America because over-litigious lawyers decided that see saws were "an unacceptable risk."

    ReplyDelete

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here.