Wow. The Orlando Sentinel has endorsed Mitt Romney for president, and it's a solid endorsement (as well as a brutal takedown of the many failures of the Obama administration):
This is a MUST READ:
State Representative Chris Dorworth has had an ongoing feud with Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell, which I've covered several times in the past (see here and here).![]() |
| State Representative Chris Dorworth |
How can you tell if Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell will be attacking State Representative Chris Dorworth? If it's a day ending in a "Y."My friend Tom Tillison had an excellent post at Florida Political Press yesterday regarding Maxwell's latest tirade against Chris Dorworth, and pointing out that Maxwell's presumptuous "advice" to Republicans should be taken with a grain of salt:
![]() |
| Not in Dorworth's Fan Club |
Setting the Record Straight, Again.
By Chris Dorworth
In just the past year, Scott Maxwell has published columns and blog posts about my mortgage, my marriage, my EPass, my cell phone usage and my Facebook account. He ignored my work to pass landmark legislation to protect victims of sexual violence, my advocacy for a property tax constitutional amendment and some of the most aggressive pro-jobs regulatory reform in Florida’s history --- issues that matter in the lives of everyday Floridians.
I did not run for office to seek approval from the Orlando Sentinel. I ran to represent my constituents and to advance good, conservative policy. Scrutiny is part of the job, but no one should be allowed to print lies about people they don’t like, as Mr. Maxwell has done time and again.
Mr. Maxwell’s latest distortions are based on his examination of the financial disclosure form I file each year as a state legislator.
What makes this remarkable is that it was my thorough and extraordinary disclosure that made this available to him in the first place. I went well beyond what is required by state law to disclose, in painstaking detail, how I earn a living, and the valuation of the business endeavors I am involved in. His complaints about a lack of transparency are ridiculous.
Far more troubling however is that Mr. Maxwell levels serious allegations without any facts to back them up. In Mr. Maxwell’s court, you are convicted first and asked to prove your innocence second.
The truth of the matter is that I do not now, nor have I ever, profited in the private sector because of my public service. In fact, my overall net worth has decreased 99% since my first disclosure was filed. How anyone could twist this into accusations that I profited from my office is bizarre.
In addition, I do not have any ownership in anything related to the Wekiva Beltway project, another baseless allegation leveled by Mr. Maxwell. I have never used my position to unduly influence the outcome of any deal – real estate or otherwise. Florida law requires that I disclose where my income comes from, and who pays it, and I have done so to the fullest extent of both the letter and spirit of the law.
My net worth is driven by two projects that I have worked on since 2009. The increased values were a result of successfully rezoning the land for development and arrangements to sell the improved parcels. Mr. Maxwell wonders why they were not disclosed on my 2009 form. It’s simple, there was no new value added to the projects until the 2010 calendar year.
Finally, Mr. Maxwell wonders in his column why I don’t reply to his questions.
It’s simple.
I consider Mr. Maxwell a gossip columnist, not a serious journalist, a point I made to his editor in explaining why I would no longer have any dealings with Mr. Maxwell. He is not bound by the same rules as legitimate journalists, who need to provide facts to back up the claims that they make.
Any legitimate review of his writings would reveal that the targets of his attacks are almost universally elected officials from the Republican Party. Further review would show that his political views are almost always liberal to the extreme. I’m just the latest in a long line of conservative Republicans that has become a subject of Mr. Maxwell’s obsession.
Scrutiny is part of the job for elected officials, and I believe the constituents who I serve have a right to know certain things about those of us who have been placed in a position of trust. I owe it to them to be transparent and accountable, and I will continue to be, but I won’t allow Scott Maxwell to continue to make up lies about me.
To paraphrase the late Patrick Daniel Moniyhan, Mr. Maxwell is entitled to his opinions, but he is not entitled to his own facts.
![]() |
| You stay classy, Orlando! |
| The "round building" today |
![]() |
| The building as it originally appeared in 1963 |
| Orlando loves you, Dwight. Please stay! |
![]() |
| Dwight Howard with fans at Bill Frederick Park on Monday |
[Rick Scott] has done a really good job of focusing on what's most important - creating jobs and opportunities in this state. He's got a track record of creating jobs, high quality jobs, and that's what we're focused on.Well said, Senator. I strongly believe that one of the major challenges facing RPOF (as well as the Republican Party nationally) stems from a failure to remember that the voters are the ones who matter. Jim Greer is now 0 for 3 in getting his chosen statewide candidates across the finish line, as his attempts to clear the fields for Bill McCollum, Jeff Kottkamp, and most spectacularly Charlie Crist, have all fallen short.
...[T[he Republican Party is unified - Jeb Bush, myself, Dean Cannon, we've all rallied behind Rick Scott. The voters have spoken, they want Rick Scott to be the Republican nominee, [and] I strongly support him.
...Jeb Bush, the incoming Speaker, the incoming [Florida Senate] President, the party chairman John Thrasher, we're all rallying behind Rick Scott because the voters matter, they're the ones who are the ultimate endorsement.
The next few months will show whether Rick Scott really deserves the "renegade'" moniker (I must admit I am having reluctant flashbacks to the overuse of "maverick" during McCain's train wreck of a campaign in 2008) but I've got a pretty good feeling about his chances for success in November.For those of us in the media, the worrisome thing about Scott...is that he has completely dissed us at a time when we are feeling very insecure about our role as major players.
He treats us like Tiger Woods treats golf reporters.
He doesn't answer our questions or take our advice.
He doesn't pay homage to our editorial boards.
He just blows us off and buys another round of ads.
And it's working. Thirty seconds on "Dancing with the Stars" trumps 30 pages of media rants.
Meanwhile, the guy who played by our rules, Bill McCollum, lost.
Every major newspaper endorsed McCollum, and he lost.
That raises a very disturbing question. What if the other politicians see this and think, "Hey, maybe he's on to something.''
By no means are we the only Lilliputians exposed by Scott.
He treats Republican Party bosses with equal disdain because they are Exhibit A in his crusade against career politicians. They threw every dime and every endorsement at their favorite career politician. And he lost.
Even worse, Jeb Bush campaigned for McCollum. And he lost. Losing a Republican primary with Jeb's endorsement is like being rejected at the pearly gates when you arrive arm in arm with St. Peter.
The Republican special interests turned their backs on Scott — the social conservatives, the business interests, even Big Sugar.
...The fear of a renegade candidate is eclipsed only by the fear of a renegade governor.
Orange County Commissioner Fred Brummer had plenty of run-ins with fellow Republican Teresa Jacobs when the two served on the same board for a couple years, even once issuing a terse memo that asked her to stop chatting on her cell phone while she sat next to him.
Now Brummer says Jacobs is the best candidate in the county mayor’s race. Why such a stunner? This is the same man who muttered two years ago, “Thank God,” when Jacobs pointed out that she was about to leave office.
“It’s a real oil and water situation, and I don’t know how you put that aside,” Brummer said of his own “personal issues” with Jacobs. “But you have to face facts: she’s the most qualified candidate in the race.”
It’s no surprise the Apopka Republican would not side with his Democratic colleagues: Linda Stewart and Bill Segal. But the other Republican in the race, Matthew Falconer, makes “wild promises he can never keep” Brummer said, such as delivering a toll increase repeal, or suggesting sports and arts venues paid for with tourist taxes means less teachers, when currently, those hotel taxes can’t be legally spent on schools.
...He still talks so fast that a notepad is practically useless. One minute he is looking at me, then at something behind me, then at the flat-screen TV behind him.
He fidgets like a gifted third-grader with attention deficit disorder. So many things to think about, so little time.
The focus of his energy remains what he believes is President Barack Obama's nation-destroying agenda.
He has a blueprint for undoing the damage. He leaps from one policy initiative to the next, his internal iPod set on shuffle. One minute it is his plan to sunset government programs, the next his plan to reform education.
Saying no to Obama isn't enough, he says. Republicans need alternatives.
It is the gospel of Jeb Bush, his mentor, delivered at warp factor 5.
...There certainly is passion. The difference between Rubio and other Republicans is that he was willing to take his beliefs on a suicide mission.
It began in early 2009 when the Republican Party, both the state and national branches, did not want him in this race. Gov. Charlie Crist was a shoo-in for the Senate, and the Republicans wanted the decks cleared so they could win back their majority.
Rubio would have been given the attorney general's race as compensation. That would have set him up for his first statewide victory before age 40.
...But he would have none of it, not with Obama implementing socialism and Crist heading to Washington to aid and abet him.
Rubio was willing to lose everything for his cause. Crist would change his cause to whatever it took to win.
Rule #1: Don't lie. If you do say something that's not true, then admit it, say you're sorry, and correct the mistake.
Rule #2: Don't be a jerk. Criticizing political opponents based on their voting record, the feasibility of their campaign promises, and their statements and actions is legitimate, and a valid way to illustrate differences between candidates. Misrepresenting an opponent's record so you can call them a "liberal" or issuing personal attacks, not cool.
Just by looking at [the McLean mail piece], one obviously assumes Mr. Horan is some sort of liberal, amnesty-loving Democrat who wants to take his open-border, Obama-loving ways to Washington, D.C.
Except he’s not.
Horan is a Republican. And the office he’s seeking isn’t federal. It’s for Seminole County commissioner — one that has virtually nothing to do with immigration.
But who cares? Immigration is the scare tactic and wedge issue of the day. So Seminole County Commissioner Mike McLean (who’s apparently a little nervous about his ability to retain his seat) decided to opt for scare tactics … whether they are relevant or not.
I don’t know John Horan. But I know McLean. He’s an affable enough guy — but also one who has a series of enough bone-headed (and sometimes ethically questionable) moves from his past that he’s right to be nervous.
But I don’t think he’s right to play these silly scare games. County commissioners have about 1,000 things more relevant to their jobs than immigration.
Want proof? How about the fact that McLean’s been on the board for four years and hasn’t done a single thing regarding immigration. (He said he once tried, but the county attorney said his effort his proposal was unnecessary.)
That means that, if voters in Seminole elect a guy who does absolutely nothing with regards to immigration, they will have selected a guy who’s done precisely what McLean has accomplished when it comes to immigration: nothing.
I asked McLean about his mailer, and he said: “I stand by it and feel it is important for voters in the upcoming Republican Primary to be informed on my opponents views on key Republican issues.”
It’d probably be more important for them to be informed of you and your opponents’ views on Seminole County issues.
...Perhaps McLean’s nervous about the embarrassing headlines he’s made during this past term — including the time he reimbursed himself with almost as much taxpayer money for local mileage as the entire rest of the county commission combined.
There was also the time when — fresh off campaigning as a fiscal conservative — he spent more than $8,000 in taxpayer money redecorating his office … including $1,200 for a high-back chair. (McLean said he felt an obligation to make the office look nice, because it really belongs to the taxpayers.)
And then there was the time McLean used county records to get the addresses of county employees, so he could solicit them for his insurance business. (His excuse? Just “trying to make a living.”)
Maybe you can see better now why McLean wants to distract voters. The question is: Will they fall for it?
So there you go. Don't lie, and don't be a jerk, and you won't have a problem with me. If Mike McLean or his campaign has a response to this, please email me or post a comment. I would hope that the response would come with an apology, but I won't hold my breath.Mr. McLean's early tenure on the commission was marred by episodes of poor judgment. He ordered more than $8,800 worth of new furniture for his county office. He obtained a list of hundreds of county employees to solicit as customers for his insurance business. He billed the county almost as much for travel in his first year as the other four commissioners combined.
These episodes would be easier to overlook now if Mr. McLean were more contrite. Instead, he dismisses them as having occurred during "different times," when public money wasn't so tight — as if it's OK to gouge a healthy budget.
And Mr. McLean has chosen to go after Mr. Horan for a 2008 guest column in the Sentinel that called on Congress to secure the nation's borders and permit "a market-driven flow of legal immigrants needed for the American economy."
Pretty reasonable stuff. And yet, Mr. McLean's campaign has likened him to President Obama. This is silly, and it's irrelevant in a county commission race.
We endorse John Horan.
What do you think?We can’t be the first to note this, but Rick Scott has a Montgomery Burns thing going on. Yes, Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.
They’re both crazy wealthy. They’re both conservative. They’re both political outsiders. They both have — or had — businesses that ran afoul of the law. And, let’s be honest, they kind of look alike.
And Simpsons fans will remember that back in the day — 1990 — Burns ran for governor in the classic episode “Two Cars in Every Garage and Three Eyes on Every Fish.” He lost.
In two terms as county commissioner, Ms. Jacobs pushed Orange County to confront its campaign-finance and ethics shortcomings. She blew the whistle on the county's plans to meet its water needs by drawing from rivers and lakes. And she wisely made sure that if money was tight the popular performing arts center would rise before the Citrus Bowl got upgraded.
As mayor, she'd spare no departments in her pursuit of efficiency (other candidates tremble at trimming public safety departments, but Ms. Jacobs astutely notes a recent decline in prisoners might mean the county needs fewer jail guards); she'd quickly invite other governments to join Orange to consider how they jointly could deliver services more economically; and she'd work to make the county an economic hub for green technology.
She supports Lynx and the coming passenger trains, but would fight to reform the murky bidding and ethics practices at the region's road-building and airport authorities....
Orange County needs Ms. Jacobs' smarts, her savvy and her principles. We endorse her for mayor.
The Sentinel’s editorial board interviewed Teresa Jacobs Thursday, but I’m not sure that Bill Segal’s campaign was watching the same interview.
The Segal camp sent out a press release Friday, a portion of which isn’t true. Now, the editorial board doesn’t make it a practice of commenting on every misleading campaign claim, and we have not yet made an endorsement in this race. But this claim purports to reflect what was said during our interview, and it does not.
... I think Segal’s folks need to take another look at the video. Because their interpretation of what was said is not even close to correct.
Orange County mayoral candidate Matthew Falconer gets accused of playing with numbers and facts by his opponents, but this time he’s tangled with Comptroller Martha Haynie and what she said is the financial reputation of the government he wants to run.
Haynie is Orange’s fiscal watchdog, so she didn’t just hit delete when she saw Falconer claim in a recent email ad: “Just this week the credit rating of the bonds for Orange County were downgraded because of ‘too much debt.’”
“My office checked directly with the rating agencies after I saw this message, and confirmed that no debt issued by Orange County government has been downgraded,” Haynie said in a statement issued late today. “Our citizens are not well served when misleading information is disseminated in campaign messages. Mr. Falconer owes it to voters to check his facts before sending out inaccurate and potentially damaging statements.”
Falconer could not be immediately reached by phone or email, but later sent a copy of a down-grade notice on bonds issued by the Orlando-Orange County Expressway — which was apparently sent to him by Haynie’s office . Haynie’s top deputy asked Falconer to correct this distinction. The toll authority is a state entity, and not a part of county government. Falconer did not indicate right away whether he planned to issue any such clarification.
[Falconer] is anti-rail and anti-taxes, anti-Magic arena and anti-tolls. He also is, all too often, anti-reality. He is inclined to making up facts. He claims he will do things he won't be able to do.
