Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2013

Bipartisan agreement: Alan Grayson is a loudmouth nut

As someone who had the unpleasant experience of having Alan Grayson as my Congresscritter for two years, this story did not surprise me at all:

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Oops. Maybe Verizon should have revised their privacy policies. [UPDATED]

Another week, another invasion of privacy and violation of rights for regular citizens. It's becoming quite an alarming routine from the Obama administration, isn't it? 

The latest "Are You Kidding Me?!" story is how the NSA has been collecting records from tens of millions of Verizon wireless customers in the U.S. under a top-secret court order, including "the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls." 

Image by Ben Howe

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Uncle Ruslan's American Dream

A friend sent me a Washington Post op-ed by Asra Nomani regarding "Uncle Ruslan," that I highly recommend you read. Seriously, just go read the whole thing and then come back here.

Ruslan Tsarni, as you probably know, is the uncle of the Boston marathon bombers (and no, I'm not saying "alleged bombers." Dzhokhar can sue me. Bring it.) and I was struck by the huge difference between his attitude about America and the views that his nephews apparently held. 

"Uncle Ruslan's" heartfelt press conference last week captured America's attention, partly because of the sharp contrast between the brutality of the bombings and Tsarni's humble attitude and unequivocal condemnation of his nephews' actions:

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Marco Rubio: We still need answers on Benghazi

Senator Marco Rubio has a new op-ed posted on CNN.com this morning regarding the many unanswered questions about the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012:

Monday, July 9, 2012

Outrage of the Day: Our border agents were firing beanbags at the drug cartel members who shot Brian Terry

Saw this at Gateway Pundit earlier this afternoon:
Gateway Pundit | White House Finally Admits Brian Terry Was Shooting Beanbags Against Cartel Assault Rifles
US Border Agent Brian Terry was shooting beanbags at cartel members before they shot him dead with assault rifles...
For the first time the Obama Administration today admitted that Brian Terry and fellow border agents were firing beanbags and not bullets during their shootout with armed cartel members.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Excellent video explanation of why Israel cannot withdraw to its 1967 borders

Last month, I wrote a post about why President Obama was completely, dangerously wrong when he stated that Israel should withdraw to its 1967 borders:
Sunshine State Sarah | A historical perspective on why Obama is wrong about Israel
In the post, I discussed several history-based reasons why I so strongly disagreed with Obama, but I did not have a lot of detail about the specific geography of Israel. I've never been there and it's not my area of expertise, so I was very pleased to find this excellent video by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, which includes some amazing computer animations of Israel's borders, mountains and bodies of water, transportation corridors, etc.:


YouTube |shaharclips | outstanding Explanation: Why Israel can't withdraw to its pre '67 borders line - Please Share

I encourage you to watch this video and share it with your friends. For more info about the JCPA, click the image below:


Monday, May 16, 2011

Sunshine, Shuttles, and Stupidity

The smoke trail from Endeavour's final launch
I took a lovely trip this morning to Titusville to watch the final launch of Endeavour. It was a picture-perfect, beautiful sunny morning and the launch, by all reports, was flawless. While I wait for my video and photos to process, I just wanted to share a few thoughts I have with you all...

It breaks my heart, boggles my mind, and boils my blood that the White House cannot see the value of the space program. Beyond just the job losses here in Central Florida, we are needlessly sacrificing a national security advantage to China and Russia, and any other country that decides to step into the void we're creating. We've cancelled a successful shuttle program with nothing to take its place, voluntarily surrendering control of space to foreign countries and corporate interests that cannot be counted on to have our same interests at heart. Any company seeking to profit from space tourism is not going to make an investment in American national security the same way that NASA and our military do.

I have two major national security-related fears. First, any student of military theory knows that there is a strategic advantage in controlling the high ground, and what higher ground is there than space? Military technology continues to advance; we've had intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles for decades, allowing us to attack any point on the globe with weapons located on our own soil. But how much of a deterrent will that nuclear arsenal be if we have yielded all ability to control our presence in the space above the flight path of those missiles? Any video-game playing child can see the problem.

Second, we are heavily dependent on satellite technology for communication. What happens if someone took out even 5 or 10% of our communication satellites? Beyond the inconvenience of losing ESPN, what happens if the New York Stock Exchange computers cannot communicate with the European markets, if telecommunications are cut off with part of Asia, if a major metropolitan area loses its internet connection? And of course it's easy to see the national security risks if we lost any part of our network of spy satellites that help us keep an eye on the many dangerous parts of the world.

The White House administration that so casually and callously allowed our shuttle program to die is the same one that senselessly placed a moratorium on drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, while President Obama travelled to Brazil in March and told a group of business leaders there, "“We want to work with you. We want to help with technology and support to develop these oil reserves safely, and when you’re ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers."

President Obama's obsession with sacrificing America's ability to control her own destiny to foreign interests doesn't end there. The Air Force is currently considering bids to build a new type of "light attack and armed reconnaissance" ("LAAR") aircraft from two companies, Hawker Beechcraft and Embraer.

The Hawker Beechcraft AT-6
Hawker Beechcraft is based in Kansas. Embraer is based in Brazil.  If Hawker Beechcraft is awarded the contract, estimates are that over 1,400 U.S. jobs in 14 states will be created, whereas awarding the contract to Embraer creates only 50 American jobs. The two companies' designs are similarly priced, so there isn't any chance for significant defense budget savings in the manufacture, but the Hawker Beechcraft AT-6 design works with a far wider population of pilots, allowing  roughly 95% of both the male and female potential pilot population with weights as low as 103 pounds and as high as 245 pounds to safely fly the aircraft. Embraer is still complying with old Brazilian standards, which would prohibit 18% of military males and 81% of military females from safely ejecting from the aircraft in an emergency.

More importantly, we cannot risk granting a foreign country the ability to ground a large part of our Air Force. Brazil was publicly and vehemently criticizing our military action in Libya only hours after President Obama finished his March visit. What happens if protecting the interests of the United States necessitates action in one of the many socialist governments in Latin America, such as Cuba or Venezuela? Hugo Chavez is extremely hostile to American interests, and we cannot predict the chaos that may occur in Cuba when the Castro brothers finally pass away.

It is clear that our economic, military strategic, and national security interests are all best served by awarding this contract to Hawker Beechcraft. Hopefully the powers-that-be in our government can break their frightening habit and put America first this time.

For more information on this vital national security issue, please check out the following links:

American Legislative Exchange Council | When American Companies Face Foreign Government-Sized Competitors
The Hill's Congress Blog | Do not hand American job opportunities to Brazil
Center for Individual Freedom | Freedom Line Blog | CFIF to Defense Secretary Gates: American Security Interests Come First, Not Brazil's
Lexington Institute | AT-6 Meets The Need For An Affordable Light Attack Aircraft


[Cross-posted at The Minority Report and Red County]

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here.